No doubt about it, video games are fun. They can provided you with hours of entertainment and enough content to make you go though it again and again.
Do games really live up to there $60 of more price tag?
On average a new game is released at $59.99. You pick it up and play it and beat it within a sold 10 hours. Now was that game really worth the $60 plus dollars (tax included) you spent on it?
I bought Ninja Blade when it came out. The game was pretty fun and I enjoyed it, but I didn't feel as if it was worth the price. It took me about 11 to 12 hours to complete and I had unlocked a large part of the achievements.
I had bought Left 4 Dead and Call of Duty World at War at there full price when they came out. Those games where definitely worth it, manily for their high replay factor. They're online multiplayer with several different modes and is different each time you play it and can continue to play it up for a year and still have a good time with it.
Ninja Blade wasn't worth the $60 i put out for it. After I finished it there wasn't enough worthy of a second play through. Left for Dead and Call of Duty I can play for months on end and have a good time with it.
Maybe it's because I'm grown and all and my parents aren't the ones buying my games but I think there should be a panel that plays the games and decides what they are worth. Because I know a lot of those movie based games aren't worth $60 I don't care what it is. $30 or even $40 wouldn't be bad for some games.
No comments:
Post a Comment